Skip to evidence
Back to selected case

Anti-casino advertising disclosure settlement

What happened

  1. promisereported

    The advertisements were presented under the name of an outside institute rather than as Trump casino-company advocacy.

    Read full record
  2. actionreported

    Trump-linked casino interests financed advertisements opposing a proposed Mohawk casino without the sponsorship disclosure regulators expected.

    Read full record
  3. outcomereported

    The parties resolved the state lobbying inquiry through penalties and disclosure-related terms.

    Read full record
  4. limitationdocumented

    The settlement included no admission of wrongdoing.

    Read full record

People and organizations

  • St. Regis Mohawk Tribeaffected party
  • New York Temporary State Commission on Lobbyingaffected party
Assessment

The settlement contradicts transparent disclosure of the campaign's sponsorship. The parties admitted no wrongdoing.