Tiny Red HandsBack to selected case

Court rejection of Trump Plaza condemnations

Court rejection of Trump Plaza condemnations

contradicted
Promised
The redevelopment authority asserted that the condemnations served an authorized redevelopment purpose connected to Trump Plaza.Open cited record · 1 source
The record
The authority sought to take neighboring properties for the expansion plan.Open cited record · 2 sources
Who paid
The court set aside the challenged condemnations, allowing the represented owners to keep their properties.Open cited record
  • Vera Coking and neighboring property owners
  • Casino Reinvestment Development Authority
Audit finding
contradicted

The ruling contradicted the proposed use of condemnation for the casino expansion and preserved the owners' properties.

Causal strength: documented mechanism

Evidence chronology

  1. promisedocumented

    The redevelopment authority asserted that the condemnations served an authorized redevelopment purpose connected to Trump Plaza.

    Open underlying ledger entry
  2. actiondocumented

    The authority sought to take neighboring properties for the expansion plan.

    Open underlying ledger entry
  3. affected groupdocumented

    The court set aside the challenged condemnations, allowing the represented owners to keep their properties.

    Open underlying ledger entry
  4. limitationdocumented

    Trump's company was the intended project beneficiary, but the government authority made the formal condemnation decisions.

    Open underlying ledger entry

Responses, legal status, contrary evidence, and limitations

  • limitation

    Trump's company was the intended project beneficiary, but the government authority made the formal condemnation decisions.