Skip to evidence
Back to selected case

Trump Fort Lauderdale licensing disclosures

What happened

  1. promisedocumented

    Project marketing used the Trump name for a luxury hotel-condominium.

    Read full record
  2. actiondocumented

    Purchase documents disclosed that Trump was a licensor rather than the developer.

    Read full record
  3. affected groupdocumented

    The project failed and buyers pursued claims concerning deposits and representations.

    Read full record
  4. limitationdocumented

    The appellate record treated the written non-developer disclosure as legally significant, limiting attribution to Trump for the developer's performance.

    Read full record

People and organizations

  • Fort Lauderdale condominium purchasersaffected party
  • SB Hotel Associates LLCaffected party
Assessment

The written contracts disclosed the limited licensing role, which counters broader inferences from the Trump branding. Buyers still alleged that marketing created a different impression.