Tiny Red HandsBack to selected case

Secret Service Costs for the Trump Sons' UAE Business Trip

Secret Service Costs for the Trump Sons' UAE Business Trip

unresolved
Promised
At Trump's January 2017 press conference, counsel for the Trump Organization said the arrangement would isolate him from the business, bar new foreign deals and donate foreign-government hotel profits to the Treasury.Open cited record · 2 sources
The record
Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump traveled to the United Arab Emirates for the opening of a Trump-branded golf club with Secret Service protection.Open cited record · 2 sourcesGAO included the trip in its accounting of federal protection costs for three early-2017 international trips by Trump's adult children.Open cited record · 1 source
Who gained
  • Trump Organization UAE licensing business
Who paid
  • United States taxpayers
  • United States taxpayers
Audit finding
unresolved

Public protection spending supported a private Trump Organization business trip, but the record does not show that the Trump business received the government's protection expenditure as revenue.

Causal strength: documented mechanism

Evidence chronology

  1. promisedocumented

    At Trump's January 2017 press conference, counsel for the Trump Organization said the arrangement would isolate him from the business, bar new foreign deals and donate foreign-government hotel profits to the Treasury.

    Open underlying ledger entry
  2. actiondocumented

    Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump traveled to the United Arab Emirates for the opening of a Trump-branded golf club with Secret Service protection.

    Open underlying ledger entry
  3. outcomedocumented

    GAO included the trip in its accounting of federal protection costs for three early-2017 international trips by Trump's adult children.

    Open underlying ledger entry
  4. limitationdocumented

    The protection was legally required; its cost is a public expense associated with, not a payment to, the private project.

    Open underlying ledger entry

Responses, legal status, contrary evidence, and limitations

  • limitation

    The protection was legally required; its cost is a public expense associated with, not a payment to, the private project.