A fourth court permanently enjoined Trump’s law-firm punishment order
Reporting and findings
- ruled unlawfulSuperseded · open corrected record
On 2025-06-27, a district court concluded that Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14263 targeting Susman Godfrey violated the Constitution and permanently enjoined it.
- Justia: Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President, Document 206Memorandum opinion, introductory holding and conclusion
- documented
The district court declared Trump's Susman Godfrey executive order unconstitutional and permanently enjoined it.
- Associated Press: Law firms urge appeals court to keep blocking Trump's sanctions against themMay 14, 2026 appellate hearing; district injunctions continued to bar enforcement
- Justia: Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President, Document 206Opinion conclusion, June 27, 2025
Summary and current status
Held unconstitutional and permanently enjoined by a district court
People and organizations
- Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the Presidentcase adjudicating the challenged action
- Donald J. Trumppresident who issued the challenged action
Relationships in this file
- Donald J. Trumpissued law-firm order struck down inSusman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President
Figures
Distinct action judicially blocked1 count Calculation details
- Basis
- Observed
- Population
- Executive Order 14263
- Period
- 2025-06-27 to 2025-06-27
- As of
- 2026-09-13
- Method
- Count the action once, not each ruling, plaintiff, affected person, or constitutional ground. Later appellate review does not create another action; this measure does not assert completed appellate review.
- Uncertainty
- One documented matter or action in the reviewed corpus. This is not a complete census of all proceedings or presidential actions.