Susman Godfrey order remained permanently blocked through consolidated appeal
Reporting and findings
- ruled unlawful
Just Security records final judgment permanently enjoining the Susman Godfrey order and a consolidated appellate track with the other challenged law-firm orders; it records no restoration of the sanctions in the cited update.
- Just Security: Litigation Tracker: Legal Challenges to Trump Administration ActionsSusman Godfrey final judgment and consolidated appellate status
- documented
On 2025-06-27, a district court concluded that Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14263 targeting Susman Godfrey violated the Constitution and permanently enjoined it.
Corrects claim:batch-200:susman-godfrey-order-permanently-enjoined-2025- Justia: Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President, Document 206Memorandum opinion, introductory holding and conclusion
Summary and current status
A fourth law firm refused a negotiated accommodation and won final judgment against Trump's sanctions. Review proceeded with the three earlier firm cases while the injunction remained operative.
Permanent injunction operative; consolidated appellate review continued in 2026.
People and organizations
- Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the Presidentexecutive action under legal and impact review
- Donald J. Trumppresident who issued the action
Relationships in this file
- Donald J. Trumpissued law-firm order struck down inSusman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President