Appeals court suppresses spa surveillance used in Kraft case

Reporting and findings

1. documented

   Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed suppression of the hidden-camera recordings because the warrants failed to require adequate minimization and the surveillance violated the Fourth Amendment. The ruling did not decide whether Kraft committed the charged conduct.

   • Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal: State of Florida v. Robert Kraft, consolidated opinionOpinion pages 2–20, warrant minimization analysis and disposition