Trump Lobbying Probe Ends In $250,000 Fine

Claims supported by this source

1. factreported

   The advertisements were presented under the name of an outside institute rather than as Trump casino-company advocacy.

   Settlement terms, parties, disclosure issue, and no-wrongdoing provision

   Anti-casino advertising disclosure settlement: Promised · Promised

2. factreported

   Trump-linked casino interests financed advertisements opposing a proposed Mohawk casino without the sponsorship disclosure regulators expected.

   Settlement terms, parties, disclosure issue, and no-wrongdoing provision

   Anti-casino advertising disclosure settlement: The record · The record

3. factdocumented

   Trump casino interests financed the campaign, and Trump was publicly identified with the opposition effort.

   Settlement terms, parties, disclosure issue, and no-wrongdoing provision

   Anti-casino advertising disclosure settlement: The record · The record

4. analysisdocumented

   The settlement contradicts transparent disclosure of the campaign's sponsorship, while the parties admitted no wrongdoing.

   Settlement terms, parties, disclosure issue, and no-wrongdoing provision

   Anti-casino advertising disclosure settlement: Audit finding · Cited analysis

5. factdocumented

   The settlement included no admission of wrongdoing.

   Settlement terms, parties, disclosure issue, and no-wrongdoing provision

   Anti-casino advertising disclosure settlement: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit

6. factreported

   The parties resolved the state lobbying inquiry through penalties and disclosure-related terms.

   Settlement terms, parties, disclosure issue, and no-wrongdoing provision

   Anti-casino advertising disclosure settlement: Outcome · Outcome