Deer Valley Realty, Inc. v. SB Hotel Associates LLC
This primary source from Florida District Court of Appeal via FindLaw supports 6 claims across 5 ledger entries.
All sources · Open original source
Claims supported by this source
- analysisdocumented
The written contracts disclosed the limited licensing role, countering broader inferences from the Trump branding, while buyers still alleged that marketing created a different impression.
Purchase documents, Trump licensing disclosures, project failure, and appellate dispositionTrump Fort Lauderdale licensing disclosures: Audit finding · Cited analysis
- factdocumented
Project marketing used the Trump name for a luxury hotel-condominium.
Purchase documents, Trump licensing disclosures, project failure, and appellate dispositionTrump Fort Lauderdale licensing disclosures: Promised · Promised
- factdocumented
Purchase documents disclosed that Trump was a licensor rather than the developer.
Purchase documents, Trump licensing disclosures, project failure, and appellate dispositionTrump Fort Lauderdale licensing disclosures: The record · The record
- factdocumented
Trump licensed his name to the project, while contracts disclaimed his developer role.
Purchase documents, Trump licensing disclosures, project failure, and appellate dispositionTrump Fort Lauderdale licensing disclosures: The record · The record
- factdocumented
The project failed and buyers pursued claims concerning deposits and representations.
Purchase documents, Trump licensing disclosures, project failure, and appellate dispositionTrump Fort Lauderdale licensing disclosures: Affected group · Affected group
- factdocumented
The appellate record treated the written non-developer disclosure as legally significant, limiting attribution to Trump for the developer's performance.
Purchase documents, Trump licensing disclosures, project failure, and appellate dispositionTrump Fort Lauderdale licensing disclosures: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit