Trump-Equitable Fifth Avenue Co. v. City of New York
Reporting cited here
- documented
The venture litigated the city's denial through the New York courts.
Holding on abatement eligibility, refunds, and interestTrump Tower tax refund ruling: The record · The record
- documented
Trump's development venture prosecuted the successful appeal.
Holding on abatement eligibility, refunds, and interestTrump Tower tax refund ruling: The record · The record
- documented
The suit sought public tax relief for a private development. Later appellate rulings substantially accepted the project's eligibility.
Holding on abatement eligibility, refunds, and interestTrump Tower tax-abatement lawsuit: Audit finding · Cited analysis
- documented
Trump's development partnership was the plaintiff seeking the abatement.
Holding on abatement eligibility, refunds, and interestTrump Tower tax-abatement lawsuit: The record · The record
- documented
The abatement claim succeeded. That cuts against treating every subsidy dispute as an adverse finding.
Holding on abatement eligibility, refunds, and interestTrump Tower tax refund ruling: Audit finding · Cited analysis
- documented
The ruling did not assess the broader fairness or fiscal wisdom of the subsidy program.
Holding on abatement eligibility, refunds, and interestTrump Tower tax refund ruling: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit
- documented
The appellate court ordered relief in favor of the venture.
Holding on abatement eligibility, refunds, and interestTrump Tower tax refund ruling: Outcome · Outcome
- documented
The ruling addressed statutory eligibility, not whether the tax policy was equitable or efficient.
Holding on abatement eligibility, refunds, and interestTrump Tower tax-abatement lawsuit: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit
- documented
The appellate court ruled in the venture's favor on eligibility and related relief.
Holding on abatement eligibility, refunds, and interest