Skip to evidence
Back

Trump Chicago v. Deutsche Bank decision

Supreme Court of New York

Read original source

Reporting cited here

  1. documented

    The Chicago project loan documents required repayment under specified maturity and extension terms.

    Loan terms, November 2008 notice, default, and competing claims

    Trump Chicago loan default dispute: Promised · Promised

  2. documented

    The lender and borrower filed competing claims before later resolving the dispute.

    Loan terms, November 2008 notice, default, and competing claims

    Trump Chicago loan default dispute: Affected group · Affected group

  3. documented

    The payment promise was missed on schedule. The financial crisis, contractual defenses and a later settlement leave the final legal and economic outcome mixed.

    Loan terms, November 2008 notice, default, and competing claims

    Trump Chicago loan default dispute: Audit finding · Cited analysis

  4. documented

    Trump notified Deutsche Bank that the project would not repay at maturity and asserted that the financial crisis triggered contractual relief.

    Loan terms, November 2008 notice, default, and competing claims

    Trump Chicago loan default dispute: The record · The record

  5. documented

    Trump guaranteed and controlled the borrowing project and personally advanced the force-majeure position.

    Loan terms, November 2008 notice, default, and competing claims

    Trump Chicago loan default dispute: The record · The record

  6. documented

    The court record reflects disputed contract defenses and later settlement rather than a final fraud finding on the default.

    Loan terms, November 2008 notice, default, and competing claims

    Trump Chicago loan default dispute: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit