Trump Chicago v. Deutsche Bank decision
This primary source from Supreme Court of New York supports 6 claims across 5 ledger entries.
All sources · Open original source
Claims supported by this source
- factdocumented
The Chicago project loan documents required repayment under specified maturity and extension terms.
Loan terms, November 2008 notice, default, and competing claimsTrump Chicago loan default dispute: Promised · Promised
- factdocumented
The lender and borrower filed competing claims before later resolving the dispute.
Loan terms, November 2008 notice, default, and competing claimsTrump Chicago loan default dispute: Affected group · Affected group
- analysisdocumented
The payment promise was not met on schedule, but the financial crisis, contractual defenses, and later settlement make the final legal and economic outcome mixed.
Loan terms, November 2008 notice, default, and competing claimsTrump Chicago loan default dispute: Audit finding · Cited analysis
- factdocumented
Trump notified Deutsche Bank that the project would not repay at maturity and asserted that the financial crisis triggered contractual relief.
Loan terms, November 2008 notice, default, and competing claimsTrump Chicago loan default dispute: The record · The record
- factdocumented
Trump guaranteed and controlled the borrowing project and personally advanced the force-majeure position.
Loan terms, November 2008 notice, default, and competing claimsTrump Chicago loan default dispute: The record · The record
- factdocumented
The court record reflects disputed contract defenses and later settlement rather than a final fraud finding on the default.
Loan terms, November 2008 notice, default, and competing claimsTrump Chicago loan default dispute: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit