Skip to evidence
Back

In re Trump Taj Mahal Associates

U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey via CaseMine

Read original source

Reporting cited here

  1. documented

    The restructuring contradicted the launch's financial-success promise. The casino kept operating and Trump retained an ownership interest.

    Bankruptcy filing date, plan, and case history

    Taj Mahal debt restructuring: Audit finding · Cited analysis

  2. documented

    Trump Taj Mahal Associates filed for Chapter 11 protection under a negotiated restructuring plan.

    Bankruptcy filing date, plan, and case history

    Taj Mahal debt restructuring: The record · The record

  3. documented

    Trump controlled and promoted the debtor casino and negotiated the restructuring.

    Bankruptcy filing date, plan, and case history

    Taj Mahal debt restructuring: The record · The record

  4. documented

    Bondholders exchanged debt for ownership while the casino continued operating.

    Bankruptcy filing date, plan, and case history

    Taj Mahal debt restructuring: Affected group · Affected group

  5. documented

    The filing was corporate, not personal, and preserved the operating business.

    Bankruptcy filing date, plan, and case history

    Taj Mahal debt restructuring: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit