United States Football League v. National Football League

This primary source from U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit via Counsel Stack supports 12 claims across 10 ledger entries.

Publisher: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit via Counsel Stack
Published: 1988-03-10
Source quality: primary

All sources · Open original source

Claims supported by this source

factdocumented
Trump advocated moving the USFL to a fall schedule as part of a strategy to compete with or force accommodation from the NFL.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL fall-schedule strategy: Promised · Promised
factdocumented
League owners approved the move and pursued antitrust litigation.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL fall-schedule strategy: The record · The record
factdocumented
Trump owned the New Jersey Generals and advocated the fall strategy.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL fall-schedule strategy: The record · The record
factdocumented
USFL proponents presented the antitrust case as a route to significant relief from the NFL.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL antitrust remedy: Promised · Promised
factdocumented
The USFL suspended play before staging the planned fall season.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL fall-schedule strategy: Affected group · Affected group
analysisdocumented
The league's move to fall did not produce the operating league envisioned by its proponents; multiple owners and market conditions also shaped the result.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL fall-schedule strategy: Audit finding · Cited analysis
factdocumented
The league obtained a jury verdict on one monopolization claim.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL antitrust remedy: The record · The record
factdocumented
Trump was a leading USFL owner and public advocate of the litigation strategy.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL antitrust remedy: The record · The record
analysisdocumented
The verdict supplied legal vindication on a narrow theory but not the financial remedy or business rescue the league strategy sought.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL antitrust remedy: Audit finding · Cited analysis
factdocumented
The league did prevail on one liability theory, so the result was not a complete legal loss.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL antitrust remedy: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit
factdocumented
The appellate court upheld a nominal damages award rather than substantial compensation.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL antitrust remedy: Outcome · Outcome
factdocumented
The appellate record identifies several causes and business decisions, so the league's collapse cannot be attributed to Trump alone.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL fall-schedule strategy: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit