United States Football League v. National Football League

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit via Counsel Stack1988-03-10

Read original source

Reporting cited here

documented
Trump advocated moving the USFL to a fall schedule as part of a strategy to compete with or force accommodation from the NFL.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL fall-schedule strategy: Promised · Promised
documented
League owners approved the move and pursued antitrust litigation.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL fall-schedule strategy: The record · The record
documented
Trump owned the New Jersey Generals and advocated the fall strategy.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL fall-schedule strategy: The record · The record
documented
USFL proponents presented the antitrust case as a route to significant relief from the NFL.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL antitrust remedy: Promised · Promised
documented
The USFL suspended play before staging the planned fall season.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL fall-schedule strategy: Affected group · Affected group
documented
The move to fall never produced the operating league its proponents envisioned. Multiple owners and market conditions also shaped that result.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL fall-schedule strategy: Audit finding · Cited analysis
documented
The league obtained a jury verdict on one monopolization claim.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL antitrust remedy: The record · The record
documented
Trump was a leading USFL owner and public advocate of the litigation strategy.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL antitrust remedy: The record · The record
documented
The verdict won legal vindication on a narrow theory and nothing else: no financial remedy, no business rescue of the kind the league strategy sought.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL antitrust remedy: Audit finding · Cited analysis
documented
The league did prevail on one liability theory, so the result was not a complete legal loss.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL antitrust remedy: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit
documented
The appellate court upheld a nominal damages award rather than substantial compensation.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL antitrust remedy: Outcome · Outcome
documented
The appellate record identifies several causes and business decisions, so the league's collapse cannot be attributed to Trump alone.
Liability, causation, and damages analysis
USFL fall-schedule strategy: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit