Skip to evidence
Back

In re Donald J. Trump Casino Securities Litigation

U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey via Justia

Read original source

Reporting cited here

  1. documented

    The project was financed through high-yield debt carrying demanding repayment terms.

    Bond offering, disclosed risks, asserted omissions, and disposition

    Taj Mahal high-yield bond financing: The record · The record

  2. documented

    Trump developed, controlled, and promoted the Taj Mahal financing and opening.

    Bond offering, disclosed risks, asserted omissions, and disposition

    Taj Mahal high-yield bond financing: The record · The record

  3. documented

    The casino opened on financing that created a documented repayment burden, and that burden preceded its restructuring.

    Bond offering, disclosed risks, asserted omissions, and disposition

    Taj Mahal high-yield bond financing: Audit finding · Cited analysis

  4. documented

    A federal court dismissed securities claims based on the offering record, which had disclosed significant risks.

    Bond offering, disclosed risks, asserted omissions, and disposition

    Taj Mahal high-yield bond financing: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit