Skip to evidence
Back

Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President, Document 206

Justia

Read original source

Reporting cited here

  1. ruled unlawful
    Superseded · open corrected record

    On 2025-06-27, a district court concluded that Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14263 targeting Susman Godfrey violated the Constitution and permanently enjoined it.

    Memorandum opinion, introductory holding and conclusion

    A fourth court permanently enjoined Trump’s law-firm punishment order · superseded evidence record

  2. documented

    The district court declared Trump's Susman Godfrey executive order unconstitutional and permanently enjoined it.

    Opinion conclusion, June 27, 2025

    A fourth court permanently enjoined Trump’s law-firm punishment order · Held unconstitutional and permanently enjoined by a district court

  3. documented

    On 2025-06-27, a district court concluded that Donald Trump’s Executive Order 14263 targeting Susman Godfrey violated the Constitution and permanently enjoined it.

    Memorandum opinion, introductory holding and conclusion

    Susman Godfrey order remained permanently blocked through consolidated appeal · Permanent injunction operative; consolidated appellate review continued in 2026.