O.A. v. Trump, 404 F. Supp. 3d 109 (D.D.C. 2019)

Reporting cited here

1. ruled unlawful

   The district court held that the asylum entry-bar rule conflicted with 8 U.S.C. 1158(a)(1), vacated the rule, and explained that Proclamation 9822 was paired with that rule; the proclamation itself stated that its suspension would expire after 90 days or an earlier qualifying agreement.

   Memorandum opinion at 45-51; order at 76-77

   Asylum bar vacated as contrary to statute · Rule vacated in 2019; paired proclamation expired by its own terms.