O.A. v. Trump, 404 F. Supp. 3d 109 (D.D.C. 2019)
This primary source from United States District Court for the District of Columbia supports 1 claim across 1 ledger entry.
All sources · Open original source
Claims supported by this source
- factruled-unlawful
The district court held that the asylum entry-bar rule conflicted with 8 U.S.C. 1158(a)(1), vacated the rule, and explained that Proclamation 9822 was paired with that rule; the proclamation itself stated that its suspension would expire after 90 days or an earlier qualifying agreement.
Memorandum opinion at 45-51; order at 76-77Asylum bar vacated as contrary to statute · Rule vacated in 2019; paired proclamation expired by its own terms. · reviewed 2026-09-03