Trump: Independent Agencies Must Submit Regs, Legal Opinions for Our Review
This authoritative-secondary source from Cato Institute supports 1 claim across 1 ledger entry.
All sources · Open original source
Claims supported by this source
- analysisreported
Cato's legal analysis describes the order as a major assertion of White House supremacy over independent regulation and notes that presidential and attorney-general legal interpretations would bind executive-branch personnel; it also distinguishes policy arguments for centralized review from unresolved statutory limits on particular agencies.
Scope of OIRA review, binding legal interpretations, and competing legal theoriesIndependent-agency order centralized rule review and legal interpretation in the White House · White House review requirements issued; statutory agency independence remains a live legal boundary. · reviewed 2026-09-03