Skip to evidence
Tiny Red HandsSearch
Back

Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, 591 U.S. 1 (2020)

Supreme Court of the United States

Read original source

Reporting cited here

  1. ruled unlawful

    The Supreme Court held the 2017 DACA rescission reviewable and arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act because DHS failed to consider retaining forbearance and failed to address reliance interests; the Court rejected the equal-protection claim.

    Syllabus at 1-8; opinion at 9-29

    DACA rescission failed basic administrative-law review · Final ruling on the 2017 rescission; later DACA litigation is separate.