Trump v. Vance, 591 U.S. 786 (2020)
This primary source from Supreme Court of the United States supports 1 claim across 1 ledger entry.
All sources · Open original source
Claims supported by this source
- factdocumented
The Supreme Court held that Article II and the Supremacy Clause neither categorically precluded a state criminal subpoena to a sitting president nor required a heightened need standard, while leaving the president ordinary constitutional and grand-jury defenses.
Syllabus at 1-3; opinion at 9-22No absolute presidential shield from a state grand jury · Final Supreme Court judgment and binding subpoena precedent. · reviewed 2026-09-03