Skip to evidence
Tiny Red HandsSearch
Back

District of Columbia v. 58th Presidential Inaugural Committee et al., Settlement Order

Superior Court of the District of Columbia

Read original source

Reporting cited here

  1. documented

    The settlement sent money to charitable purposes and closed the case with no merits adjudication and no admission by the defendants.

    Consent motion, payment provisions, and no-admission clause

    Inaugural Committee and Trump Hotel Settlement: Audit finding · Cited analysis

  2. documented

    The settlement sent money to charitable purposes and closed the case with no merits adjudication and no admission by the defendants.

    No admission of wrongdoing or liability provision

    Inaugural Committee and Trump Hotel Settlement: Audit finding · Cited analysis

  3. documented

    The agreement expressly stated that the settling defendants did not admit wrongdoing or unlawful conduct.

    No admission of wrongdoing or liability provision

    Inaugural Committee and Trump Hotel Settlement: Evidentiary limit · Evidentiary limit

  4. documented

    The parties executed a settlement covering allegations that nonprofit inaugural funds had improperly benefited Trump businesses and related private interests.

    Consent motion, payment provisions, and no-admission clause

    Inaugural Committee and Trump Hotel Settlement: The record · The record

  5. documented

    The complaint and settlement named Trump business entities and concerned the inaugural committee created for Trump's 2017 inauguration.

    Consent motion, payment provisions, and no-admission clause

    Inaugural Committee and Trump Hotel Settlement: The record · The record

  6. settled

    The District alleged that the committee overpaid the Trump hotel to benefit the hotel and Trump Organization; the settlement order records that defendants disputed the allegations and denied wrongdoing or unlawful conduct.

    Paragraphs 1–3 of settlement order

    Inaugural money flowed to the Trump hotel; defendants paid $750,000 to settle · Settled without admission of wrongdoing or liability

  7. settled

    Defendants agreed to pay $750,000 to resolve the District's claims, without the settlement being construed as an admission of wrongdoing, unlawful conduct, or liability.

    Paragraphs 3–4 of settlement order

    Inaugural money flowed to the Trump hotel; defendants paid $750,000 to settle · Settled without admission of wrongdoing or liability