Skip to evidence
Back

100 ways Trump has hurt workers in his first 100 days

Economic Policy InstituteCeline McNicholas, Samantha Sanders, Josh Bivens, Margaret Poydock, and Daniel Costa

Read original source

Reporting cited here

  1. reported

    Economic Policy Institute's first-100-days review connects the DOGE structure to agency workforce and service-capacity reductions and identifies affected public workers and programs; those effects are reported and analyzed separately from DOGE's own claimed savings totals.

    Federal workforce, DOGE, agency capacity, and public-service sections

    DOGE structure embedded White House-aligned teams in agency personnel and technology decisions · Temporary organization authorized through July 4, 2026; embedded-team consequences outlasted setup.

  2. reported

    Economic Policy Institute's review describes the hiring order as adding ideological or loyalty-oriented screening to civil-service recruitment and analyzes the risk to a nonpartisan workforce; it is not a finding that every hire was politically selected.

    Federal hiring and civil-service politicization discussion

    Merit-plan order added presidential-policy alignment to federal hiring screens · Hiring-plan directives moved into agency guidance alongside broader workforce controls.