Trump v. Vance, 591 U.S. 786 (2020)

Reporting cited here

1. documented

   The Supreme Court held that Article II and the Supremacy Clause neither categorically precluded a state criminal subpoena to a sitting president nor required a heightened need standard, while leaving the president ordinary constitutional and grand-jury defenses.

   Syllabus at 1-3; opinion at 9-22

   No absolute presidential shield from a state grand jury · Final Supreme Court judgment and binding subpoena precedent.