Skip to evidence

Paying to Fire and Rehire

What happened

  1. promisedocumented

    Trump promised to cut trillions of dollars in wasteful federal spending with Elon Musk's help.

    Read full record
  2. actiondocumented

    OPM offered eligible federal employees deferred resignation, with pay and benefits through September 30, 2025 and generally no expected work requirement during the deferral period.

    Read full record
  3. outcomereported

    CBS reported the Partnership for Public Service's rough estimate that DOGE-related paid leave, lost productivity, and firing and rehiring would cost about $135 billion in fiscal 2025.

    Read full record
  4. affected groupreported

    Associated Press reported that GSA asked hundreds of employees to return after months on paid leave, an agency-specific example of reversal and paid nonwork time.

    Read full record
  5. administration responsereported

    GSA said it had made staffing adjustments in the best interest of the taxpayer and that workforce decisions continued to evolve.

    Read full record
  6. administration responsereported

    A White House spokesman rejected the Partnership analysis as an illegitimate effort to undermine DOGE's efficiency claims but did not provide a component-by-component alternative estimate in the cited report.

    Read full record

Amounts and affected parties

  1. public costModeled fiscal-2025 cost of DOGE workforce disruptionroughly $135 billion
    Loss or cost borne by
    U.S. taxpayers
    estimated · 2025-04-28 · projected · central scenarioRead source record
    Calculation detailsPopulation Federal agencies implementing workforce reductions; Federal employees separated, placed on leave, or later rehired; U.S. taxpayersPeriod 2024-10-01 to 2025-09-30Projection horizon 2025-09-30Basis Partnership for Public Service started from approximately $270 billion in annual federal workforce compensation and modeled paid leave, lost productivity, and firing-and-rehiring costs; CBS reported the model and components.Limits Not a government audit or booked outlay total. The public article does not expose a reproducible component table, and incomplete documentation and behavioral assumptions make the estimate high-uncertainty.

People and organizations

  • Federal agencies implementing workforce reductionsaffected party
  • Federal employees separated, placed on leave, or later rehiredaffected party
  • U.S. taxpayersaffected party
Assessment

Paid leave, back pay, rehiring and lost productivity are documented costs, and they contradict any pure-savings account of the workforce campaign. The $135 billion estimate carries its modeling limits and is useful for scale alone.